Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/FloNight

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
A Rose for you

Right now, I am recovering from an ailment which had kept me away from wikipedia for 3 weeks - I remeber the care of the persons assciated with healthcare, and would love to present you roses, with these words of Elizabeth

A ROSE

A lovely rose with petals soft
A scent so sweet and light
So beautiful a flower
With colors shining bright.
But something not so savory
About the fragrant rose -
The thorns, so sharp upon the stem,
That sharpen as it grows.
Yet still lovely is the flower
Despite the thorns that prick
Just as life and love are sweet
They too have thorns that stick.
But do not fear to live or love,
Life's not exempt from pain -
So pick a rose, you may get hurt,
But you will also gain!

Bhadani is diffirent, all the best to you FloNight! --Bhadani 07:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure

Copy of her response on my talk page

Hello Bhadani : ) Thank you for the roses. They are beautiful. It was a wonderful way to start the day. FloNight talk 11:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Copied from my talk page. Nice meeting and talking to you. Please have some roses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/FloNight --Bhadani 07:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. --Bhadani 12:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Mccready

Hello Mccready : ) Thank you for your interest in my RFA. I'm sorry that you have concerns about admins in general and me in particular. I hope you will look at my reply and reconsider your opposition to my RFA.

  • If you look at these diff. you will see that I did reply to this editor on their talk page twice. [1] [2] and then I put a message on the talk page for the person closing the Mfd. I asked them to double check the history to make sure all comments were noted. [3]
  • Regarding the comments left by the next editor, I didn't delete them. I made them not visiable on my talk page. This editor was having a difficult time on Wikipedia. This comment being visible wasn't helpful to the situation. The editor didn't mind me removing it. He in fact remove similar comments off his own talk page. I ask you to please trust me that this was a positive move and helped the situation. As you can see we continued to work together to lower his stress level. [4] [5][6]
  • The last comment I removed was from a banned user that was wikistalking me. This is policy. This particular banned user is causing serious problems for Wikipedia and some editors. I believe it is being addressed by Jimbo.

I hope this answers your concerns. If not I will be happy to answer more questions. --FloNight talk 17:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be on the main page under his comment, so that all other voters can take this into account? --Kickstart70-T-C 18:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure to tell you the truth. That's why I put it here. I could leave a comment pointing people back here. Or I could move it. --FloNight talk 18:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Either is probably fine...I'd likely just copy it. Cheers, Kickstart70-T-C 18:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent significant contributions

Brenda Cowan a new article, Harvey J. Alter new article.

Added history and other content to University of the Cumberlands, a Kentucky college currently in the national media.

Ongoing rewrites to these articles after I saw message left on AN/I. David McSweeney rewriting after message left on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive92#David McSweeney. Rewriting Chad "Corntassel" Smith because it was part of a dispute between two groups of editors and their sock puppets. Patricia Cornwell has persistent vandal.

Rewrote the introduction and another section of William A. Dembski. Added text about education and career to Lauren Slater. Slowly expanding National Religious Broadcasters.

Kentucky stubs started. Natural Bridge State Park (Kentucky), Ashland Community and Technical College stub, Big Sandy Community and Technical College stub.

Also of note. My very first article CIA leak grand jury investigation is featured on the on the Current events page under Ongoing.

I participate in talk pages discussions on many articles related to pedophilia. If the articles are stable, I edit them. I have a 1RR, (except for vandalism, defamation, or copyright violations which of course I remove more than once as needed) so pointless for me to edit unstable articles. Example of ongoing discussion talk:Pedophile activism Many of these articles are targets for vandals so I watchlist them all. FloNight talk 23:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]