User talk:Thunder8

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi, Thunder. I agree with your (self-)nomination of the North Carolina State University article for WP:GA status. Great job! Now, at last count, there are more than 1,000,000 other articles Wikipedia would love your help on. Just kidding. Or not. In any event, congratulations. Justen Deal 06:40, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Native Americans in the United States

This edit confuses me. You left no edit summary and nuked an entire section. Please explain. savidan(talk) (e@) 20:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind lending your opinion to a content dispute that I am currently involved in on University of South Carolina. As you may know, USC has a strong rivalry with Clemson University. I feel that the athletics section of the article should discuss this rivalry, and I feel that this discussion should include a reference to the overall record between the two schools in various major sports. Other editors have disagreed, and feel that the record should not be mentioned. As it happens, Clemson leads in two of the discussed sports and USC leads in the third. I would appreciate it if you would consider lending your opinion on this issue on Talk:University of South Carolina. Thanks! Ëvilphoenix Burn! 00:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ACC

Just so you know, I removed the US News rankings from the infobox of the members of the ACC. The rest of the info in that box is all factual representations of characteristics of each member university (ie, when it was founded, enrollment, number of national championships, etc.). To add a ranking, the basis of which no one really fully comprehends, except for the folks at US News, and that many university presidents have publicly said they disagree with, offers no true, or factual, insight to an conference athletics page. The information might be relevent to each schools' individual page, but I don't see the connection between this subjective ranking and an athletic conference article. I think if you want to add something about the ACC athletics and it's members' performance in the classroom, a section on athlete graduation rates might be a good place to start. AriGold 14:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Darla Moore

Sorry for my earlier deletion of the image of Darla Moore on University of South Carolina, Thunder8. I didn't notice that Darla Moore was listed in the section. I moved her image down so that it would "overlap" her entry there (like the pictures for Hootie and the others do). -- JHunterJ 15:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking out the history makes sense, actually. It's now in the Talk page to document why the article got split out, in case somebody wants to prod it later. Thanks for the reply, so we've got it covered. —C.Fred (talk) 16:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


North Carolina Constitution

I had a chance to read that paragraph, and the Whole County Provision hasn't really been struck down--simply limited in its application. As I understand it, unless it's necessary to ensure single-member districts (and presumably "one man, one vote"), no county can be divided. Blueboy96 01:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An observation about the "at Raleigh" edit issue in North Carolina State University

I have good faith in my fellow editors, but I find it curious that the string "unc" appears in the name of the editor who stirred the pot by reinserting "at Raleigh" all over the article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Moore School of Busienss logo.gif

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Moore School of Busienss logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Importance

Sorry, I guess I forgot what the what I rated the university when I rated the sports department. Feel free to change one of them. --Mr.crabby (Talk) 14:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania in Atlanta!

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 04:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NCSU WOLF.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:NCSU WOLF.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WCU Seal.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:WCU Seal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St Aug Newshield.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:St Aug Newshield.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UNC System

That's fine with me. I had planned to update the entire article to more recent numbers this evening, but I only had the time to update Charlotte. Ironman5247 (talk) 02:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tm-logo-col.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tm-logo-col.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PKT COA.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:PKT COA.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Recall (company)

A tag has been placed on Recall (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 15:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NCSU Technician header.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NCSU Technician header.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]