User talk:Rosshaartrimmer
June 2023
Hello Rosshaartrimmer. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rosshaartrimmer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rosshaartrimmer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 15:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Mr.Ollie,
- thank you for your message, and advice - I did not know that.
- Last time, I tried to edit the article, I was told, that there needs to be a better source (not a blog or video...) to support/prove the written content. Now, that there is the better source, there is this new thing you mentioned above.
- You are right, I am on the payroll of the inventor of eSIM.me, but this does not change the facts, which I wrote down and these facts are completely valid and imho important enough to be shown in this article about eSIM. Don't you agree?
- I will follow your instructions of disclosing my employer and propose the changes on the talk page. Never the less I see that this topic is very important as eSIM.me affects the whole SIM and maybe even telecommunications industry - I mean it is not just another OEM or roaming-aggregator that has a new eSIM device or new eSIM profiles in its product portfolio, but a binary game changer for the global eSIM acceleration. Don't you agree?
- Looking forward to your response.
- Best regards,
- Max Rosshaartrimmer (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)