User talk:Ibua

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qua People (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Qua People and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Qua People concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Qua People, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Qua People

Hello, Ibua. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qua People".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Duplicated "Atrocities against ethnic minorities in Biafra" section in "Nigerian Civil War" article

Hello, Ibua.

In the Nigerian Civil War article, I noticed that a section that you wrote, "Atrocities against ethnic minorities in Biafra", appears in two places in the article: here (I'll call this the War copy because it is placed inside the "War" section) and here (I'll call this the Reckoning and legacy copy because it appears inside that section).

The content in both sections is word-for-word identical, beginning with "Minorities in Biafra suffered atrocities..." and ending with "...by both sides in the conflict.¨

This is the history of the two copies:

1. You created the sections "Ethnic minorities in Biafra" and the War copy in the "War" section: [1]

2. You blanked "Ethnic minorities in Biafra" in the "War" section with the edit summary "wrong section" but left the War copy in place: [2]

3. You copied "Ethnic minorities in Biafra" and the Reckoning and legacy copy into the "Reckoning and legacy" section: [3]

In step 2 above, did you intend to blank the War copy but overlook it? If this is the case, I would be glad to complete the step if you don't have time. My intent here is to have only one copy of the section in the article: the Reckoning and legacy copy. That copy seems better integrated with the material around it than the War copy.

Thank you for your contributions to this article.

Dieter.Meinertzhagen (talk) 20:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)