User talk:Champ68
Did Bob McCaslin Jr. Get sworn in early?
I'm going to change the State Senate to what I had originally because, A.) there are no more sessions of the old legislature left to be had, and B.) The Majority Coalition Caucus is establishing what the new body will look like next session, so it's better to be prepared then not. Also, I've spent countless hours this week on this page updating it, and can gaurentee you these results are accurate. I would love if you would let me keep these changes, because again these are the results, and the old legislature won't be meeting ever again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UWHuskyFan (talk • contribs) 19:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
Biography article creation
Hi Champ68! I just wanted to touch bases with you on the articles which you are creating. While your contributions are welcome and appreciated, please make sure to provide wikilinks only to pages that are currently existing, rather than to redirected pages or disambiguation pages. While you have created several articles today, someone actually needs to clean up these articles to bring them into compliance with the encyclopedia's guidelines. You can check out some guidelines for creating and editing biographies at these links: WP:MOSBIO and WP:OPENPARA. Please make sure to review these guidelines before creating any further articles. Also, make sure to use the Americans article for identification in the lede sentence for individuals from the United States. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 11:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
How to post WSRC images on Wikipedia
Hey, thanks for your improvements to the Washington's 1st Legislative District page! I noticed you posted some material from the Washington State Redistricting Commission (WSRC), but it seems like you improvised your uploading and are unfamiliar with file uploading procedure (which is fine! Improvisation is a great way to learn, and how I do most of my Wiki learning).
If you're interested, I have a tip for how to upload WSRC images more easily and reliably. (The same basic idea can be applied to various free use uploads.) Just go to the Wikipedia Commons upload wizard, (create an account if you don't have one), and follow the directions until you get to the "Now tell us why you are sure you have the right to publish this work" under the third step, "Release Rights." Click on "Another reason not mentioned above" and, for WSRC files, paste {{tl:PD-WSRC}} That's it! If you're uploading another file that you think is fair use, you can look up the appropriate template here. Following that method makes uploads MUCH easier, in my experience.
Hope that helps! Blessings, --Wikibojopayne (talk) 23:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
You may be new here
But you don't automatically revert people's changes. Talk:Washington State Senate I've already started a discussion and you are free to participate. Discuss, then make changes. This is also helpful in this case. Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Your automatic reverting is not particularly helpful even if you have discussed on my talk page. Paying $7 is not acceptable source by any wikipedia standards because it is still original research and not accepted. ViriiK (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Another thing is that there is such a thing called the 3 Revert Rule which you've already exceeded (You are currently at 6 Reverts) and I'm not giving you a warning over that. ViriiK (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Washington House of Representatives elections, 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Stanford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm TheCascadian. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Troy Kelley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheCascadian 06:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of census-designated places in Washington may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Please do not automatically revert changes made by other editors. I removed un-sourced personal information from the page of a living person, pursuant to Wikipedia's BLP guidelines, and explained my reason for doing so in the "Edit Summary." You reverted the change without providing a reason, and it appears you continually do this on other pages as well. Please review Wikipedia's editing guides, as your edits are not constructive.
With respect to the Pete von Reichbauer page, I only removed material which did not cite a source. Regardless, we are to "exercise extreme caution in using primary sources" and "not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth" (See WP:BLPPRIMARY). If you feel BLP standards do not apply, or you have sources that document the material in question, please start a discussion on Talk:Pete_von_Reichbauer. Otherwise, please refrain from rolling back constructive edits that comply with Wikipedia standards.
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matt Manweller, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Host and Producer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
30th district
Not premature at all when all major news outlets in the district are calling it for Hickel, and she's winning by something like 8 points, and there certainly won't be another special session between now and then. UWHuskyFan (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randy Tate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Hill, Virginia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Champ68. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Champ68. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Champ68. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Holepunch (Cloud service) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Holepunch (Cloud service), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 16:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of UserLAnd Technologies
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on UserLAnd Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.fossmint.com/userland-run-linux-distros-on-android/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Railfan23 (talk) 07:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
The objected to content has been removed
Accidentally published while I was editing a first draft while reviewing secondary sources. But that's since been removed.Champ68 (talk) 07:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
UserLAnd Technologies moved to draftspace
I've moved the article UserLAnd Technologies to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. It's still under construction and there is a danger it would get deleted in it's current state. In draftspace you are free to flesh it out and then it can be moved back to articlespace. Best, Railfan23 (talk) 23:36, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Is there a way to alert an administrator as to those warning boxes at the top of the page so that they may take the necessary actions to resolve the matters and remove them? Thanks, Champ68 (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- The copyvio-revdel template adds the article to Category:Requested RD1 redactions which administrators regularly look at. Beyond that, you could look in Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests and approach one of the admins listed there on their talk page. Railfan23 (talk) 19:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Draft:Holepunch (Cloud service) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Holepunch (Cloud service), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Holepunch (Cloud service)
Hello, Champ68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holepunch".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Headquarters, Washington for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headquarters, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
wizzito | say hello! 01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Evergreen Terrace, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subdivision/neighborhood fails WP:GEOLAND2, notability not established with substantive sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 03:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Harrington Place, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topo shows a site, not a community. Article is flat-out false, and notability is not established with substantive sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 03:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Davis Terrace, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subdivision/neighborhood fails WP:GEOLAND2, notability not established with substantive sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
- Saint Helens, Washington
- Caples Landing, Washington
- Vision Acres, Washington
- Woodland Park, Washington
- Kid Valley, Washington
- Rocky Point, Cowlitz County, Washington
- Caples, Washington
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Pigeon Springs, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence found that this was a populated place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND. The only reference that could possibly establish notability is reference 3, which is a passing one-sentence mention in an article about a totally different topic. Non-notable place.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)