User talk:Cdpaghadar

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

August 2020

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Precast concrete, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wall. Materialscientist (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 17:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerification needed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cdpaghadar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

User:Materialscientist is taking benefit of there position. After notice i did not made any contribution. i added link . i don't think it was promotional to cite Cdpaghadar (talk) 1:36 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Nothing you have provided has improved the Wikipedia project. You've either added spam links or removed information from articles. None of this helps build articles. only (talk) 17:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cdpaghadar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

When i added the link, at that time i was not aware how and what to add in Wikipedia. as well as administrator also sent me the warnings as i seen today. but at that time i was not aware that kind of notify/message or warning system. Please unblock me Cdpaghadar (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were simply spamming. If you didn't know that was wrong, you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Nothing here convinces me otherwise. Indeed, you appear to be attempting to further mislead us by claiming you didn't see the warnings until today, when you clearly saw the warnings back in August, 2020. Yamla (talk) 10:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cdpaghadar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

yes i saw the notice to don't add the links. But i mean to say that when i added links and i received the notice from your side at that time i was not aware about notice or how to and what to add into Wikipedia page. It's honest request. Now all the things are on your hand to remove the block or not. I can not argue Cdpaghadar (talk) 18:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to commit not to write about yourself or your company; in any future unblock request, tell us what sort of things you want to edit other than about your company. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.