User talk:78.1.100.214
Progress Democrats and the Three Revert Rule
You're on the cusp of violating the Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule:
The motivation for the three-revert rule is to prevent edit warring. In this spirit the rule does not convey an entitlement to revert three times each day, nor does it endorse reverting as an editing technique. Rather, the rule is an "electric fence".[1] Editors may still be blocked even if they have made three or fewer reverts in a 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive. Efforts to game the system, for example by persistently making three reverts each day or three reverts on each of a group of pages, cast an editor in a poor light and may result in blocks.
Please take this discussion to the talk page of the article and sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Also please consider creating an account. It's free, and it gives your edits a bit more credibility in the eyes of others. Best. T L Miles (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.