User:The Utahraptor/RfA criteria

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a subpage describing what qualifications I think an RfA candidate must have in order to succeed. Some may agree, others may disagree. I am open to suggestions for improvement, so feel free to send me a message if you see anything that I could improve on.

In order to earn my support, an RfA candidate must:

  1. Have no warnings for vandalism within the past year;
  2. Know all of Wikipedia's core policies;
  3. Have no civility problems within the past six months;
  4. Have experience in administrator-related areas, such as WP:AIV, WP:RPP, WP:AFD, etc.
  5. Have no record of engaging in an edit war within the past year;
  6. Have at least six months of experience;
  7. Be able to abide by Wikipedia's policies;
  8. Not run for adminship within three-six months of failing;
  9. Understand basic wikimarkup;
  10. Be able to do maintenance tasks;
  11. Be mature;
  12. Not argue with opposers (agreeing to disagree is fine);
  13. Use edit summaries for at least 70% of both major and minor edits;
  14. Have at least 30% of their edits be to the article namespace;
  15. Not have over 30% of their edits be to their user namespace;
  16. Know how to deal with stressful situations in a civilized way;
  17. Demonstrate knowledge of policy with their answers to the optional questions;
  18. Have written at least three articles (not including stubs);
  19. Demonstrate the ability to establish consensus and;
  20. Not have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts within the past year.
RfA candidates I've nominated
Name of candidate RfA link Results (support/oppose/neutral) Pass/fail
The High Fin Sperm Whale Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The High Fin Sperm Whale 2 1/5/0 Fail
5 albert square Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/5 albert square 101/2/1 Pass