User:Pythoncoder/ACE/2022

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

It's election season once again on Wikipedia, and that means it's time for the 2022 edition of my ArbCom voting guide. As I said last year and the year before, I have no idea if anyone will read or care about this, but I was going to end up making something like this for myself anyway, so I might as well post it publicly on the off-chance that it’s useful to other voters.

Note: if you want to see symbols next to the support/oppose/neutral text in this table, may I recommend my Vote Symbols userscript?

All my ArbCom voting guides: 2022202120202019

12 candidates running for 8 seats:

Candidate Vote Other comments
Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) Support Current arb, no issues
BoldLuis (talk · contribs) Oppose WP:NOTQUITEYET
CaptainEek (talk · contribs) Support Current arb, no issues
GeneralNotability (talk · contribs) Neutral Some concerns about past temperament [1] (made under previous username Creffett) but not enough to put me in oppose.
Guerillero (talk · contribs) Support More active this year — activity was one of my main concerns last year.
L235 (talk · contribs) Support Current arb, no issues
Moneytrees (talk · contribs) Weak support Has arb clerking experience so that's a plus, though they resigned while still a trainee.
Primefac (talk · contribs) Support Current arb, no issues
Robert McClenon (talk · contribs) Oppose I regretfully oppose all non-admins running for ArbCom because I feel that adminship represents a minimum level of community trust that I look for in arbitrator candidates.
SilkTork (talk · contribs) Support Current bureaucrat, and has experience for the job as a former arbitrator.
Sdrqaz (talk · contribs) Neutral No serious issues but I'd like to see at least a year of admin experience before promotion to arbitrator.
Tamzin (talk · contribs) Weak oppose Concerns were raised on the discussion page about this candidate being too controversial and confrontational, then their responses proved that point. Also recently went through a particularly contentious RfA — maybe wait a couple years for the dust to settle before running again.