Template talk:Taxonomy/Bacilli
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
May 2019
Under Streptococcus bovis on the right side of the page, it says it is bacilli as that is incorrect, it should be coccus.
There is the same issue on the Streptococcus pyogenes page [1] 2407:7000:9A2D:F408:5185:86D1:6CD9:BE46 (talk) 21:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
References
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please see above. This hasn't been resolved and is a very important error to note. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.111.147 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not done I can't find anything in the referenced source that indicates a problem. I also can't find anything in related Wikipedia articles that indicates a problem. I DID find that some terms, like Bacillus, have more than one meaning (see Bacilli#Ambiguity). That may be the root of the confusion. (non-template-editor closure) davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)