Talk:Visy

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Impartiality of Controversy Section

The article is likely written by someone at Visy, given the detail level. This in itself is not a bad thing. However I think the controversy section could use some more work. The price fixing items should be expanded to be more in line with the detail in the Richard Pratt article - although the article here lists the conduct as "Alleged" the other article points out the court has "This is the worst cartel to come before the courts in 30-plus years," and "There can be no suggestion that Visy acted in ignorance of its obligations under the act," — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.170.5.5 (talk) 01:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

American-Australian.

It should be an Australian-American company. They expanded to the USA. 2001:8003:64B0:F201:A57A:207C:BB76:2901 (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Changed. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]