This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
I moved the article to a revised name, as I believe the name of the church is itself "Trinity Church", without "Pittsburgh" in its name, and also for consistency with other church naming. The pic makes the church look old, but for some reason it is not listed on the U.S. National Register, I guess. Nice pic and article, anyhow. doncram (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Trinity Cathedral
Isn't the name of this monument Trinity Cathedral? That's the name listed on the website, and everyone in Pittsburgh calls it that. — AlekJDStalk 06:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anglican Realignment
This article focuses on the building and site but has no mention of the recent turmoil related to Anglican Realignment when the cathedral served both the Episcopal Church and Anglican Church in North America. Does anyone object to adding a section to reflect this? Sjrplscjnky (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)sjrplscjnky 6 January 2017[reply]
