Talk:The Lie of the Land

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Trilogy

Just wondering, should we still be referring to these as "loosely connected"? They appear pretty sequentially coherent to me. I realize that's just an opinion but the word "trilogy" is pretty definitive and is sourced. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The source does state 'This episode opened a loose three-parter billed as “The Monks Trilogy”' - but I also haven't seen any other sources call it 'The Monks Trilogy'. I'd agree with the 'loose' at this stage - but we'll see how it comes out in the wash (looking at you DWM). If I was a betting man, I think it's probably going to be classed a three-parter - but I personally see it as a single ep and then a two parter. Dresken (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Last of the Time Lords

I think the article should have a see also link for Last of the Time Lords as it has been noted that Lie of the Land looks similar to that earlier episode. 122.106.83.10 (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Discussion at Talk:Last of the Time Lords --TedEdwards 13:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]