Talk:Stephen McKeever

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Why Direct Mckeever to the stubbier?

The Ted Mckeever article is much better layed out and less of a stub (Multiple paragraphs vs. seven sentences). If you can only drum up seven sentences about a man (some of which are more about his brother) is he realy noteable enough to have his own wikipedia article? Hell I could right more about my grandfather who was just and average guy. If wikipedia will let every jack off have an article it will take away from it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.88.96.130 (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Stephen McKeever

Why Direct Mckeever to the stubbier?

Navigation menu

Search