Talk:Snow/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I pass this article as a Good Article. It is reasonably well written, neutral, stable and well referenced with in-line citations (thus verifiable). The topic is clearly of top importance. Numerous problems were fixed during the review. I am sure some remain and encourage other editors to further improve this article. Extra efforts would be needed (perhaps Peer Review) to bring the article to an A level. Review comments are listed below. Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I know nothing about meteorology, thus be prepared :)
Anything else you think is needed for GA purposes? Thegreatdr (talk) 03:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
|