Talk:Seth Kinman/GA2
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I will begin reviewing this article and make straightforward changes as I go (explanations in edit summaries). Please revert any changes I make where I inadvertently change the meaning. I will post queries below. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have rearranged some of the paragraphs for flow. I'd be good to merge or expand some more, but this is challenging to do and not a deal-breaker for GA status.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images need WP:ALT text.
Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Prose is a little choppy due to subject matter but quite engaging in a western tall-tale kinda way..interesting read. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)