Talk:Se-tenant (philately)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 11 June 2024
 | It has been proposed in this section that Se-tenant (philately) be renamed and moved to Se-tenant. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Se-tenant (philately) → Se-tenant – I am not at all sure that "se-tenant" has the mentioned second meaning; I sospect the creator browsed the internets and got confused with the term "pro se tenant". In any case, per WP:MOSDAB, philately is the primary meaning, and the second one (if any) should be introduced via a hatnote. - Altenmann >talk 06:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- No objection to the move but I think some of the article is in error - there was a se-tenant production of US stamps in a miniature sheet in the 1930s. Daveosaurus (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)