Talk:Scottish religion in the seventeenth century/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 19:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Almost there, see my comments below.--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Writing
- Lead is too long and detailed. Try shortening it and re-writing it in a more summary style.--¿3family6 contribs 20:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- "Restoration" seems a bit long as one section. Consider breaking it into two or three sections. You also might want split "Glorious Revolution" into two sections.--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- "Religion and society" - since the article is about religion in Scotland, I would advise retitling this.--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- I would suggest making it clear that part of the article deals with history, and another part on rituals and practices. You could put all of the historical timeline under a main "History" sections, turning the current sections into subsections.--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Referencing
- Which source supports this sentence? - "There may also have been a growing scepticism and with relative peace and stability the economic and social tensions that contributed to accusation may have reduced."--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- "Statutes passed in 1616, 1633, 1646 and 1696 established a parish school system, paid for by local heritors and administered by ministers and local presbyteries.[46]" - the citation provided supports the second statement, but not the date provided.--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sources are offline, which means I am accepting them as accurate per WP:AGF. I am doing the same regarding the possibility of close paraphrasing and copyvios. I urge the nominator to make sure that there are no issues with accuracy, close paraphrasing, copyvios, or original research.--¿3family6 contribs 20:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- I was hoping to get to this a bit quicker but its the heaviest period of work for me. I might need the while weekend to get this done if that's OK.--SabreBD (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- @3family6:@Sabrebd: Checking on the status of this review. It has been nearly a month since it was last touched. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- 3family6, Sabrebd, it's been several weeks since the above, and Sabrebd's made over 240 edits in the interim, none of them to the article. I'd like to suggest that a hard deadline be set, no more than a week away, to close this nomination one way or the other. The remaining issue has been hanging fire since the end of June. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Looks good, Hchc2009. Sabrebd, I'm passing this now. Sorry for how long things took.--¿3family6 contribs 14:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC)