Talk:Science-Gossip

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Update 2015-05-31

I updated a part of this little stub. I tried to distinguish between the two series that were published. Part of the text I left as it was, for now, although I think it's really necessary to clean it up. As soon as I find some time........ Dick Bos (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate use of "we"

The 'Owners and editors' section reads as if copied from an uncited source, or perhaps just oddly written with "we believe...", "we were given to understand...". If it is a quotation, it should be rewritten to make the source clear (i.e. who are 'we'?), otherwise it should be rewritten to remove 'we'. Gregmchapman (talk) 03:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Science-Gossip

Update 2015-05-31

Inappropriate use of "we"

Navigation menu

Search