This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Oppose. The first sentence of the Raspberry page explains the reason perfectly "The raspberry is the edible fruit of a multitude of plant species in the genus Rubus, most of which are in the subgenus Idaeobatus". The Raspberry page corresponds more-or-less to the subgenus Idaeobatus, and absolutely not to the single species Rubus idaeus. Nadiatalent (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as well; all species should are inherently notable and should have their own article. Sources for this specific species exist, anyhow, and it already has some references listed. —fetch·comms 22:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Framboise
Is Framboise really an English common name? The interwiki handles names in other languages, so I'd like to delete it here. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Leaves and other parts
Nearly all of this section is poorly sourced and un-encyclopaedic. Statements like this - "Berries and berry extracts possess properties that make them important in the prevention of cancer" - are nonsense, and the sentence after the above quote is taken from a purely for profit commercial website that sells herbs. If there are no objections, I want to remove the above. Roxy the dog (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
