Talk:Pratt & Whitney XA101

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Why is the overview identical to the GE XA100

Both article have identical intros, the only difference being the name and the manufacturer. The issue with this is we do not know the thrust of both engines as it is stated. Also no sourcing. MarkusDorazio (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pratt & Whitney XA101

Why is the overview identical to the GE XA100

Navigation menu

Search