Talk:Poinsettia/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 21:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Enwebb! This has been sitting in GA nominations for a while, so I'm reviewing it.

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


  • The source from Gardening Know How seems a bit sketchy? Like I know it's run by gardeners but it's still a blog.
    • replaced
  • Same with the Teleflora blog. Are these reliable and unbiased?
    • replaced
  • The habitat and range section could be more detailed. Do you know whether it prefers rainforests or drier areas? High elevation or low elevation?
    • I've expanded the range section, making it more detailed.
  • More information on ecology would be helpful. Are there any organisms that eat it? The information about pollination could go in an ecology section as well.
  • The "In culture" section could perhaps discuss how the plant became more associated with Christmas. (Like mentioned in the "Cultivation" section)
    • added a sentence
  • I know it isn't necessary, but alt text for the first image would be helpful.
    • added alts for all images

Other than these, the article is really good! It's very informative without being too complicated. starsandwhales (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Starsandwhales sorry it took me so long to finish this up--I think I've addressed all your concerns so far. Enwebb (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]