Talk:PicoChip

COI

The COI flag was placed on this.

It is true I work for picoChip, and probably should have said that on TALK before, but have tried to follow NPOV and reference all statements. Re-reading it I'm not sure I would change anything? But if you feel I am biassed or POV then please edit & correct. I'm posting under my own name so am hardly sock-puppet.

As such I removed the flag. Rupert baines (talk) 15:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Consistent Name?

The title page says 'PicoChip', but the article says 'Picochip', and there are a few other variations around... Which is correct?

When the company was first set up, it was styled picoChip (small initial p, capital C in the middle) as was fashionable in the 90s and early noughties. This was changed to Picochip (ie rendered like any other proper noun)in October/November 2010, in a corporate rebrand. So take your pick. It was never PicoChip. Andy Gothard (I was the Director of Corporate Marketing responsible for the '10 rebrand).

Initialisms

What is meant with GMACs, GIPS and LIW? --Abdull (talk) 21:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Simply lookup the abbreviations using wp?

Programming PicoChips

gcc now supports the picochip [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.107.228 (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

no more: "All GCC ports for the following processor architectures have been declared obsolete: picoChip (picochip-*)" according to [2] --Veob66MI (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC)