A fact from Perry v. Louisiana appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 1,101 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Perry v. Louisiana is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
Article issues
I removed content, that as written screams bias, and a dead link. All articles are to be written from a neutral point of view but specifically a BLP "must adhere strictly" to this as well as verifiability, and no original research. Please see the appropriate section of: Biographies of living persons, as well as the fundamental principles that "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". The content presented a bias, one-way view, against medicating death row prisoners. If one view point is presented then balance dictates impartiality according to Due and undue weight. --- Otr500 (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
