Talk:Paper War of 1752–1753

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articlePaper War of 1752–1753 has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 30, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 29, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that one critic describes Christopher Smart's The Hilliad as the "loudest broadside" of the Paper War of 1752-1753, a literary dispute involving Henry Fielding, John Hill, and many others?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Paper War of 1752–1753/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    What on earth is a "paper war"? Though I can guess, the lead is too vague as to what this is.
    The "war" lasted until 1753 and spanned many of London's publications. "spanned" is usually used for either bridges or lengths of time. "London's publications" are neither.
    Such an event is believed to have occurred (if it occurred) on December 28, 1751. What event?
    Before Hill had revealed this information, he attacked Fielding's Amelia in the London Daily Advertiser on January 8, 1752 where he claimed that the books title character "could charm the World without the Help of a Nose." Isn't that a compliment?
    I've got a feeling that Regardless of the merits of Hill's claim, a war was soon started: by the third issue of The Covent-Garden Journal, Fielding narrowed his satire upon John Hill. shouldn't be part of the quote.
    Is Fielding wrote as "Sir Alexander Drawcansir", Hill as "The Inspector", Thornton as "Madam Roxanna", and Smart as "Mrs. Mary Midnight". even a sentence?
    Fielding was unable to leave the fight until the sixth issue of The Covent-Garden Journal published since the beginning of the fight. is confusing. Do you mean Fielding was unable to leave the fight until the sixth issue of The Covent-Garden Journal published after the fight began.?
    Yes, I think I rewrote to that effect (but dropped the last part as mention of that is probably confusing to others as it probably was in the original line). Ottava Rima (talk) 13:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I am told that dates should not be linked. I'm not 100% sure if this is definite though, so feel free to ignore this point.
    Pretty sure Template:Reflist should be limited to two columns.
    Any reason your refs read Poetical Works p. 443 while your bibliography reads 738 pp.?
    "Number pp." means "total pages". "p. number" means page it is found on. I'm removing the total pages to overcome any confusion. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Although there was much criticism, there was some support for the work, and an anonymous pamphlet was written to attack "Hill and 'the Town'" and praise the novel. is unclear; clarify "the work" and "the novel".
    Fixed. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    those who were identified with the Greek and Roman classics along with the modern French literature. is unclear. Do you perhaps mean characters from Greek and Roman classics and French literature?
    Fixed. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • With his 25 August 1752 The Inspector column, Hill harshly criticized Smart's Poems on Several Occasions. I replaced "he" in this sentence with "Hill". Please check to make sure this is accurate.
  1. That is correct. Thanks. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Henry Fielding started a "paper war" in the first issue of The Covent-Garden Journal (January 4, 1752) against "hack writers". How did he do this?
    instead, many preferred to use pseudonyms along with their standard attacks. What were their standard attacks?
    Fielding's attacks and his "Universal Register Office". And what is the "Universal Register Office"? (Feel free to wikilink)
    he soon followed up the pamphlet in the London Daily Advertiser which said?
    I clarified both. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The image needs alt text.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Taking a short break. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR talk // contribs 03:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Few more items. Other than that, this looks good. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR talk // contribs 06:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Overall:

Pass/Fail:

All issues have been resolved.Cheers! ɳOCTURNEɳOIR talk // contribs 19:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Paper_War_of_1752–1753"