Talk:Noble Beast

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Genre

Writing the genre before the album is released and with only one track available for preview is pure speculation. 79.114.169.146 (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to mark that it is? Or should it just be removed? Banjaloupe (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's been leaked. Genre isn't necessarily speculation anymore, and the leak should potentially be noted, although I'm not sure of its origins. 98.220.214.217 (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Professional review suggestion

As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review of Andrew Bird's Noble Beast. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) [1]
Mike harkin (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for the heads up! I think reviews might need to have a score at the end, but I'm not sure of the rules about it. Hopefully someone else will stop by and let us know...*hint hint* Banjaloupe (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Banjaloupe, reviews do not necessarily need a numerical or star score--they can be considered "favorable," "mixed," or "negative." In this case, the review is favorable. Mike harkin (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Noble Beast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]