Talk:Michael Wallace (lawyer)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
Would someone lend my reference a hand and make it work, please?
May 2013 cleanup
The section on his judicial nomination reflected a pretty clear POV and included a lot of he said / she said (well - mostly just "he said") detail. I've tried to edit that section down to a more neutral statement of the facts, and one that doesn't include a lot of what, to me anyhow, seemed like argumentative detail. JohnInDC (talk) 15:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)