Talk:Michael (archangel)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Edit notice

This edit notice has been present since 2011. May I suggest that it has served its purpose and can now be removed? Sojourner in the earth (talk) 20:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I second this motion. Eruditess (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revelation of Jesus Christ

Please correct where it's written "Revelation of John" under "New Testament" to Revelation of Jesus Christ as it is the way written in the scripture Rev.1:1 The book is the revelation of Jesus Christ, NOT John 2601:14D:4B80:4960:101:CE2A:EE48:EA61 (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to "Book of Revelation". Sojourner in the earth (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
marking as  Done Eruditess (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly 2604:2D80:9E90:D00:8078:30EA:DBCB:FA10 (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural

I just wanted to add in the TV show Supernatural the Archangel Michael appears for several episodes. Anyone want to add? Lady Meg (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lady Meg: no, that's trivia. You'd need a third-party source that discusses why it is notable and significant to the subject of this article. Skyerise (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus regarding the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament

In the New Testament section, references 14, 21 and 22 all cite the "Satan" section of the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, pages 156-157. The text with those sources in the article gives a certain narrative that perked my ears as possibly not reflecting academic consensus. They are:

  • That Revelation 12 indicates that "The fall of Satan at the coming of Jesus marks the separation of the New Testament from Judaism"
  • That Luke 22:31 indicates that Jesus "…thus takes on the role played by angels, and especially Michael, in Judaism"

In the first point, Revelation 12/13 never indicates a separation from Judaism. In the second, Luke 22 never indicates that Jesus is taking on a role from Michael, and in fact never mentions Michael at all.

I could be completely off-base, and I don't want to start slapping tags on the article without a discussion. What are others' thoughts on either the source or its characterization in the article? AnandaBliss (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]