Talk:Louisiana's 2nd congressional district

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Partisan bashing and using nomenclature fallacy in said interest=

Objective political alignment(conservative vs progressive vs liberal) and party realignment are necessary to avoid disengenuine partisan bashing present in the previously accepted edit. the current text blames Modern Democrats for disenfranchisement while ignoring the absolute continuous role of conservatives and the objective role of the modern Republican party and multiple high quality references have deleted and ignored.

Michael Hahn = "Unionist"?

Why is Hahn listed in the list of reps as a Unionist? His bio page says he was elected to Congress as a Republican. --Jfruh (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist

Why don't the footnotes appear with this article? They're in the editable version. Can someone fix this situation? Rammer (talk) 16:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louisiana's 2nd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]