Talk:List of taxa with candidatus status
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of taxa with candidatus status article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
AfC Reviewer Note
Approval of AfC was done on the basis that this appears to be a sensible WP:SPINOFF of candidatus, Candidate division, or another article. I have no opinion on whether a merger would be appropriate. --joe deckertalk 02:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Excel List
An Excel List ist provided with Table S1 there:
- Cindy J. Castelle, Jillian F. Banfield: Major New Microbial Groups Expand Diversity and Alter our Understanding of the Tree of Life. Cell Perspective, Vol. 172, No. 6, pp1181–1197, 8 March 2018, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.016; esp. Tbl. S1
Summary of new potentially phylum-level groups described based on genomes from metagenomes or single cells (or concentrates).
Please, can an expert check and possibly merge this information? Thanks in advance. --Ernsts (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)