Talk:Lake Hayward (Wisconsin)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hangon rationale:

First, notablility is a non-issue. There's a lot of consensus that named geographic places are notable.

Second, has the nominator done a good faith search to determine that this cannot be expanded at all? Real life interrupted my work on this, but I seriously doubt that a lake in Wisconsin cannot expand beyond a stub. (And sheesh, give me more than two minutes to expand the thing.)--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refactoring my comment, now that I've had a chance to calm down a bit. Sorry for the outburst, but thanks for the reminder of how new editors feel when an article gets a speedy tag.

"Unlikely to expand" is not a valid CSD reason. At the time of tagging there was content and context, and it was a perfectly valid stub. It told the reader exactly what and where the subject was, and even gave a coordinate so the reader could look it up on a map. If the article never expanded beyond that, it would still be a valid article, meeting both WP:N and WP:V.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation to this article. If the nominator had look at the citation and seen the map that the lake is located within Hayward, Wisconsin.Thank you-RFD (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Hayward (Wisconsin). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]