Talk:Jordan Scarlett (footballer)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requested move 27 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Converting base name to disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Jordan ScarlettJordan Scarlett (footballer) – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nomination. Neither of the two men named "Jordan Scarlett" is primary over the other, thus leading towards the creation of a two-man disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 00:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support, create DAB at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, but swap basename with Jordan Scarlett (American football). There is a primarytopic here - the American football player article that gets 87 percent of pageviews. This is a WP:TWODABS case, with no dab page needed. Dohn joe (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support but consider creating a DAB at the base name unlike some of the others 720 v 130 views[[1]] isn't huge when you take into account the incoming external links problem. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, and turn base name into a disambiguation page, as there is no PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 11:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.