Talk:HARKing

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 February 2020 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Twitter poll citation in an article about dubious scientific practices

I'd hope this would go without saying for the folks editing an article about HARKing, but a Twitter poll isn't illustrative of anything, and should never be cited as evidence that a certain viewpoint is or isn't widely accepted by scientists. Toadchavay (talk) 13:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:HARKing

Twitter poll citation in an article about dubious scientific practices

Navigation menu

Search