Talk:Grand Lake o' the Cherokees

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Changed to C Class

In my opinion, numerous changes to this article merit its reclassification from "Stub" to "C" Bruin2 (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grand Lake o' the Cherokees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links

While three, maybe even four would not be arguable ten "External links" are far and above too many. If someone would care to look at this it would preempt my indiscriminately removing some to trim the link farming that includes some that could be considered tourism advertising. Otr500 (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17 days have passed so I am going to trim the "External links" to around three. Clear violations of policies and guidelines need to be discussed as a revert of policy based maintenance actions could be considered tendentious editing.