This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
A fact from Gesta Tancredi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Gesta Tancredi, one of the most important contemporary histories of the First Crusade, was not translated into English until 2005?
I'm just a little concerned about the subject matter of this article. It seems to be more about Ralph of Coen than of the Gesta Tancredi. --JB Adder | Talk 13:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They are inseparable, the historian and his history. Why not add a plot summary with a spoiler warning, which commonly serve in lieu of analysis in Wikipedia?--Wetman 20:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
