This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
A fact from Frankenstein, MD appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
"comedy/Gothic horror": rephrase as "Gothic horror comedy", or simply "horror comedy". We can't use slashes like that, and the Gothic aspect is probably too specific for the lead anyway. If you are to include it, make sure to link to Gothic horror.
Done
"Frankenstein, MD was announced on May 5, 2014": shorten to simply "May 2014"; the exact date isn't necessary.
Done
"The show is PBS Digital's first scripted program though": add a comma before "though".
Done
'which Su claimed was because, "Real science': decapitalize "Real".
Done
In the cast and characters section, changed the em dashes (—) to en dashes (–) (em dashes aren't supposed to be spaced per MOS:DASH).
Done
Try to tighten the quotes in the section. We don't need the elaboration of what STEM stands for, for example.
Done
Conform to MOS:EMBED standards throughout the list (read specifically #Bulleted and numbered lists; a number of them mix sentence fragments and non-fragments with incorrect punctuation).
Done, I think.
Split the list of episodes into its own article at some point? Not going to hold passing the article on it, but it's rather unsightly in the middle of all the prose.
If anything is added to the episode list (ie, episode summaries), I'll split it off. For now I think it's just short enough to stay but I could move Reception up above it if you think it would be better suited there.
That's all I got. Nice work! On hold for 14 days. 23W 06:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to mention: try to cut down repeat consecutive references at the end of sentences if you can afford it (e.g. not after a direct quote per WP:MINREF). If you need help with this, I can probably do it for you. 23W 07:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. 23W, tell me if you feel I've missed anything and I'll be happy to work on it. Thanks for your review! BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 21:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: Looks good. One more thing: if the series isn't over, remove the last_aired parameter from {{infobox television}}. 23W 21:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wish it weren't over but there has been no indication that a second season is being/will be produced. In lieu of evidence otherwise, I'm just going to assume that what has been produced is all that will be produced. Does that work? BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 22:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: It's standard for us to wait for networks to announce their cancellation (in most cases, not being mentioned at any upfronts is a good indicator), but since this is a web series, I guess anything goes. I'll pass anyway. 23W 22:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done
@Bobamnertiopsis: It's standard for us to wait for networks to announce their cancellation (in most cases, not being mentioned at any upfronts is a good indicator), but since this is a web series, I guess anything goes. I'll pass anyway. 23W 22:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
