Talk:Foothill Technology High School
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
> FTHS received the score "885"
From what? Meaning please!
On the CST's... --Blue Moon Dragon 02:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Low quality defined
This article is nothing short of an advertisement and elitism. Looking through the history, the last good edit was here. Now it's horrible and dominated by what appear to be students and staff members. 66.34.149.108 03:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- As a Ventura native and someone who works in the school system, I'm here to give some background. Foothill is controversial among some students and parents. It's perceived as attracting the best high school students in the district, siphoning them away from the comprehensive high schools and lowering their test scores. Just after Foothill opened, scores and rankings at both schools dropped (they have since rebounded). That's probably where the charges of "elitism" come from, combined with the perception that Foothill's a "rich kids' school".
Fair use rationale for Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg
Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg
Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've addressed the specific image policy concerns (i.e. the rationale didn't specify an article and there was no source information). If anyone feels that's still not good enough, let's discuss. szyslak 18:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)