Talk:Durham rule
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Undated comment
Don't really have time to edit, but I disagree with this assertion. "Expert witnesses are used in trials for the sole purpose of providing facts, not provide opinions." Expert witnesses are called in medical malpractice trials to give their opinion based on their learning and experiences. The expert qualification entitles the witness to give opinions; fact witnesses (all others) are limited to testifying as to facts.
Categories:
- Stub-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Stub-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles