Talk:Dáil Constitution

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Provisional" Constitution

Whether the Dáil Constitution, and therefore the Irish Republic, was intended from the beginning as an interim document/administration or one subject to ordinary amendment was one of the major points of disagreement between the pro- and anti-Treaty parties. Inclusion of the word 'provisional' in article 5 may well have explicitly indicated only that the constitution was , like all constitutions, subject to change in the prescribed manner. For an editor to attempt to definitively decide this point retrospectively, opens that assertion to a charge of political revisionism . RashersTierney (talk) 09:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dáil Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]