Talk:Centrifugal-type supercharger
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reads like an advert
This article reads like a page from an old McCulloch/Paxton supercharger sales folder. The fact that the section offers no drawbacks to centrifugal superchargers should be a red light, especially in the context of applications in automobiles.
Isn't there some Wikipedia rule against things that read like advertisements?Bwob (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is a Wikipedia article on superchargers. Perhaps this article is redundant.--JHowardGibson (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete This??
I have just proposed the deletion of this page on the grounds that the subject is adequately covered elsewhere. I am searching down through the supercharger page and I see that it links here. I will undo my edit. Does this really need to be a separate page? JHowardGibson (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Aviation articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Aviation articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
- Aviation articles needing attention to structure
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft engine articles
- Aircraft engine task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles