Talk:British Rail Class 380

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Classes 320 and 322

To inform you all that the Class 322 EMU fleet are to come off lease from First ScotRail in 2010/from next year, when the Class 380 EMU arrive at First ScotRail. The Class 320 is to be *RETAINED* by First ScotRail and are NOT being withdrawn from service. Information came from Rail (magazine).

--Peter Skuce (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delay

Here is a passenger announcement. "Glitches on new trains mean six-month delay to services - Herald Scotland | News | Transport & Environment". Retrieved 2011-01-03. . . . . dave souza, talk 19:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible change to the title of this article

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Avicennasis (talkcontribs) 18:23, 10 March 2011

Four-car units

I think that I'm right in saying that Class 380/1 were the first four-car EMUs to be allocated to Scotland; indeed, so far as I can work out, all previous EMUs in Scotland, right back to the Class 303 of fifty years earlier, had three cars. Does anybody have a source which explicitly states that 380/1 were the first Scottish EMUs not to have three cars? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Class 322s operated in Scotland. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, yes, there were only five units, they were there from 2001 to 2011 and I think they only operated east of Edinburgh, so I probably missed them. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 380. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]