Talk:Bona Malwal/GA2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Czarking0 (talk · contribs) 05:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- thanks for re-reviewing the article, I will try to amend for your comment as you post them. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- one thing to bare in mind, Sudan is not the US when it comes to coverage. Even now, it is really hard to get any information, if does not relate to war or massacre. The sources listed in the article, is almost any and every article that mentioned Malwal, ever. I have even read Malwal autobiography but there he still focused on his opinion of the events, and not what was going on the ground.
- There is also some trivia that I excluded, like the time Malawal saved Ibrahim El-Salahi from execution after the 1975 Sudanese coup attempt, which I could not include to keep the article focus FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for calling that out I will certainly keep that in mind. I think if this captures all the available material it can certainly be considered good Czarking0 (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your understanding. Please see my reply below in green and I took the liberty to delete what I though I have solved (feel free to double check)
- I think I have covered most of your comments and waiting for you to conduct further reviews and indicate where your concerns was resolved and where you think I need to do better. Thanks to your comment the article size has increased by 20%
- again, thanks for taking the time to re-do this FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for calling that out I will certainly keep that in mind. I think if this captures all the available material it can certainly be considered good Czarking0 (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- I moved the review forward a bit. I wonder if there are more sources on his government duties in arabic texts or another language but I do not speak any that will be of use here. Czarking0 (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- I added more details from Arabic sources, although one of them mentioned a different year of birth!. I also included a section about Jieng Council of Elders FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Made a comment on one of the sources not being reliable. I am slowly getting through all the new changes Czarking0 (talk) 03:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- responded and take your time, generally there is no deadline on Wikipedia .. FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I responded to that. I also wanted to point you toward this source which is in polish so it probably is not too helpful for us but it does cite some English sources. Part of the value of this review I think is some source material discovery. I think the Sudan project could benefit from some tips on sourcing.
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335728266_Jieng_Council_of_Elders_a_parallel_government_in_South_Sudan Czarking0 (talk) 01:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- have a look when you have tie and thanks for these insights. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- responded and take your time, generally there is no deadline on Wikipedia .. FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
Nice work from @FuzzyMagma the article has come a long way. I hope this adds to the standard of what makes a GA in the Sudan project |
- ^ Contreras, Joseph. "Press Release" (PDF). UN Missions. United Nations Mission in South Sudan. Retrieved 20 March 2024.