Talk:Berliner (format)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
The Christian Science Monitor has been using the berliner format much longer than the J&C cited in the article, anyone know how long though? —Preceding unsigned comment added by FozzyMaple (talk • contribs) 20:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Renamed from "Berliner (newspaper)" to avoid confusion with the Berliner newspaper. -- Picapica 13:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Why's the format called that, if the Berliner newspaper doesn't use it? --Oolong 11:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
- I've added an explanation (and the reference I got it from) to the article - basically, it's "Berliner" as in "Berlin" (like Parisien or Mancunian or whatever) and dates way back before the First World War. - IMSoP 22:38, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Berliner format
Does anyone know the actual beginning date of this format?--84.152.187.226 15:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)gete
The place of origin is then, Berlin? I would love to know the specifics about the origins of the format! 86.56.152.251 19:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Half-berliner?
http://www.editorsweblog.org/print_newspapers/2007/04/uk_guardian_weekly_to_switch_to_smaller.php - not sure whether this is the same as "Compact" Snori 19:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The Guardian in images
Confusingly, the two pics illustrating and comparing the Berliner format show The Guardian as an example of both a broadsheet and Berliner newspaper. This isn't actually incorrect (the paper was redesigned and changed format a few years ago) but is without explanation and will be puzzling to anyone unfamiliar with UK newspapers. A new image with a different broadsheet example would be clearer for most readers. --Ef80 (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
File:NewspaperSizes200508.jpg Nominated for Deletion
|
An image used in this article, File:NewspaperSizes200508.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
|
| A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)