Talk:Battle of Ostrovno

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Russian & Soviet / Napoleonic era B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Untitled

Adam's lithography (1830s) is available here. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 11:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled 2

Indecisive French Victory - Russian Strategic Success? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever! It was either a Russian Strategic Success (Russian Victory) or a French Victory. You can't have two victors when only two sides fight a battle. I don't know much about the battle, but this seems like b/s. If you are unsure, you can put draw or something.

- User XYZ

Talk:Battle of Ostrovno

Untitled

Untitled 2

Navigation menu

Search