Talk:Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Stub, really?
The description has enough detail that a stub was highly unwarranted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.204.195 (talk) 01:30, April 5, 2011
- Please review WP:STUB. This article is well within the definition. In addition, your consistent removal of stub template from numerous articles without explanation may be considered as disruptive. elektrikSHOOS 02:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, different person here. I've read through the above link on stubs as well as the linked Croughton-London rule. It is my opinion that this is not, under the Croughton-London rule, a stub as there simply isn't much more that can be said about this topic. If any sort of decision is in consideration, I think that the stub tags should be remove on those grounds.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.74.7 (talk) 11:53, May 1, 2013