Talk:Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
Comprised and comprising
JHunter didn't like the Supreme Court's style, so he changed the opinion (a blockquote) to reflect his ideas of better usage. That should be a NO NO. If you don't like what they say, at most you use a "[sic]." You don't edit the opinion. In this case, the reason for the edit was not even valid. This is not a claim. It is a prose statement. "Comprised of" is perfectly OK and even sounds better. PraeceptorIP (talk) 18:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)