Talk:Armstrong Siddeley Screamer

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Coventry Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coventry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CoventryWikipedia:WikiProject CoventryTemplate:WikiProject CoventryCoventry articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Something seems wrong with those dates...

Development took 8 years to a prototype? That seems odd. So does the fact that development started before the project it was intended to power. Anyone have better dates? I find this difficult to believe. Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Armstrong Siddeley Screamer

Something seems wrong with those dates...

Navigation menu

Search