Talk:Anglo-Saxon mission

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Merge

About combining anglo saxon with hiberno scottish, .. NO! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.109.196.15 (talkcontribs) 30 october 2006.

Propose merge as per Wikipedia:Proposed mergers (Aug '06) xCentaur | 19:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Earliest monastery founded by Anglo-Saxons on the continent

The article text states, "The earliest monastery founded by Anglo-Saxons on the continent is Echternach (698)." Saint Rumbold however, was supposed to have been an 'Irish' (though possibly Scottish) missionary who built a monastery at Mechelen. He is often seen as a contemporary of Willibrord and as a brother of Himelin and thus as an Anglo-Saxon missionary. The traditionally accepted date of his death in 775 would not contradict the statement, but recent state-of-the-art examination of his relics in the St. Rumbolds Cathedral showed a death date between 580 and 655. That would make the assumed monastery at Mechelen several decades earlier than the one in Echternach. I assume the doubt about his death date would make St. Rumbold a Hiberno-Scottish missionary. — SomeHuman 8 Nov2006 21:11-21:24 (UTC)

Pagan focus

the focus of this article is on the mission of the pagan Saxons and Frisians in the very north of the Frankish Empire, but the Anglo-Saxon mission was also very active in bringing the Arianistic souther neighbours of the Franks to catholic/Nicaean Christianity, notably the Alemanni, the Bavarii, the Langobardians and the remaining Visigoths in Aquitaine. Those tribes had been Christian long before those monks arrived, having adopted a form of Gothic Christianity much earlier and were in the 8th century in their majority not pagan any more. I recommend therefor to add the word "catholic" to the first sentence: Anglo-Saxon missionaries were instrumental in the spread of catholic Christianity in the Frankish Empire during the 8th century. --El bes (talk) 16:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it would be nice if you could add more, referenced, detail on this. Johnbod (talk) 03:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Anglo-Saxon missions deserve so much better than the article so far

WTF is going with this beady little article? it's so small it's creepy! I know most in Britain have never heard of the A.S missions (they haven't been allowed to by the elites) but still, enough good stuff floating about on googlebbooks to a better job than as it stands. Really is a shame. No excuses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.247.107 (talk) 18:36, 22 October 2015

How long did the Anglo-Saxon missions to Germany last until?

And what examples of their influence in later yearhundreds? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.69.252.128 (talk) 01:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]