Talk:American Near East Refugee Aid
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisement
This article looks like it was pretty much copied and pasted from the ANERA website, which is why it initially received the copy-vio tag. It looks like the website has since changed, and I don't know how appropriate the copy-vio tag is, but it still reads like an advertisement. I've started cleaning it up a little bit, but it needs a lot of work. -- Irn (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed the advertisement tag, but the Programs section could definitely still use some work. -- Irn (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on American Near East Refugee Aid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529234352/http://209.41.185.247/aboutUs/history.php to http://209.41.185.247/aboutUs/history.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Tone could be made more encyclopedic
The tone of the intro paragraph (mostly its last sentence) and the rest of the article give an impression that isn't quite Wikipedia-like. The content is mostly well-sourced, so the article could likely be improved by rewording without deleting content. TROPtastic (talk) 01:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)