Talk:Aldous Huxley

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aldous Huxley article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as High-importance).

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction High‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Humanist?

In what sense was Huxley a humanist? He did not sign the first Humanist manifesto. His views expressed in the Perennial Philosophy would be too supernaturalist (or at least ambiguous) for secular humanists today. I guess he would have not been opposed to humanism - probably, but calling him a humanist seems a stretch to me. And I note there is no citation. Slimy asparagus (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC) I wonder if there is an element of confusion with Julian Huxley who was definitely a humanist: https://humanism.org.uk/humanism/the-humanist-tradition/20th-century-humanism/sir-julian-huxley/. Slimy asparagus (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree. More a mystic than a humanist. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Why limit the definition of humanism by contemporary secular humanism? At best, it would be a sub-category, and it doesn't seem to engage in dialogue with the historical and classic development of humanism. Huxley was definitely a humanist in its purest, historical and traditional sense. Secularism is not and has not been fundamental to humanism. 2806:2F0:93A0:B063:916C:825E:A21B:7C9F (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information

Could someone update the article to include the quotes from his work - "Confessions of a Professed Atheist"

Does he wrote this work? (Also quotes are more appropriate to wikiquote than wikipedia) AnyFile (talk) 05:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

Can someone with the knowledge of it add the pronunciation of the name -- AnyFile (talk) 05:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Nys

The Maria Nys link takes one back to the Huxley page. She is described very briefly as a Belgian refugee, although we know she was at Garsington in 1910 [1]https://huxleyandthebloomsberries.wordpress.com/important-relationships-are-born-at-garsington/. I think a separate page for Nys would help resolve these concerns. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Place of Huxley's Death

I dispute the recent (Nov 24, 2023) article change, re Huxley's place of death, by 202.142.67.236. This person has changed the place from Los Angeles to London, England. Huxley died on November 23, 1963. Nicholas Murray's exhaustive biography Aldous Huxley (listed among the article's references) presents what seems reliable information concerning where, on pages 452-455. Murray says that Huxley died in the Cedars of Lebanon Hospital, which in 1963 was located at 4833 Fountain Avenue, Los Angeles, California.

No service for Aldous Huxley was held in California, but his ashes were sent to England and a memorial gathering was held on December 17, 1963 at Friends House (in London).

I'd give this issue some time. Maybe someone has better information, contradicting what Murray presented. If not, I will undo the recent change and put in Murray's information.Joel Russ (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. And sorry, I've reverted before I read your message here. The death certificate of Huxley is on familysearch.org (free registration required) and specifies the address of death at 6233 Mulholland Highway (same address than his "last usual residence") but no hospital is cited. Other source with same address here. Regards, Xavier 90.6.144.196 (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting that, I applaud your good research. It could be that Murray was unaware (or uncertain) that Huxley was brought home from the hospital before he actually passed.Joel Russ (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He died at the home of friends, according to NYT. Regards, Xavier 90.6.144.196 (talk) 20:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huxley's Personal Religious Views

I added a section about Huxley's Personal Religious Views, as they were not covered, for the most part, in the article. Saying that Huxley was religious is controversial, but a fact, none the less. He felt the quest to "know your real self" in the Vedantic sense was the whole purpose of life. He was explicit about this in his essay The Minimum Working Hypothesis, "to achieve this unitive knowledge of the Godhead is the final end and purpose of human existence." I welcome corrections or additions, but maintain that this section is needed to let the readers know Huxley's views on religion. Ellis408 (talk) 03:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellis408: Frankly, this falls more under spirituality than religion. I will change the heading to reflect this. Skyerise (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you appear to be making assumptions and arguing from primary sources, such as Huxley's Introduction. That's considered original research. If you want to call something a "religious view", you must cite a reliable secondary source that explicitly uses the term with respect to Huxley. You can't derive conclusions, only report the conclusions of others. See also our prohibition against synthesis: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source." Skyerise (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skyerise - Thank you for the editing and comments. I will go through all the notes you made and dig out more sources and references. I really do appreciate your help to make this article better and complete. I have almost everything written about Huxley and will find the relevant source material - and make corrections or deletions, if needed. Ellis408 (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can the note about Original research come down now? I think I addressed your concerns. Thanks, Ellis408 (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]